Tag Archives: Journalism

The Death of the Ivy League Journalist

Another Christmas present

Seeking to fortify its core assets, New York Times Co. is actively shopping its stake in the holding company of the Boston Red Sox baseball club…

My favorite bit: 

former General Electric CEO Jack Welch took a serious look at the [Boston] Globe two years ago, when people close to them said they were valuing it at $550-600 million at the time. The Times rebuffed the inquiries. The Globe was recently valued by Barclay’s at $20 million.

Boy, did Neutron Jack dodge a bullet.  That’s a $530 million loss in value over two years.  Mommy!!!  The time has come for the old media to awaken from their dogmatic slumber.  New media is bringing the old Gray Bitch to her knees.  Her arteries, filled with generations of mental cholesterol, have clogged.  I eagerly await the day when all of those former Harvard Crimson writers flee like rats from the headquarters on 43rd Street, scurrying away in every direction before the building collapses in bankruptcy, frantically looking for some other institution to shield their beliefs from confronting reality.  Other credential makers, indifferent to truth seeking, will call out to these souls like sirens.  My guess, applications to PhD programs in English and History increase.  We may even hear calls for universities to subsume newspapers into their mission.  They’ll rehash old arguments the Roman citizens would offer in defense of slavery.  A civilized community is not self-sustaining, they’ll claim.  A barbarous substratum, the capitalists, must be whipped into the social structure so as to support the civilized apex embodied by the Times.  And like the Romans, they’ll say this large slave population is required to perform ancillary services, anything which is deemed unworthy for a truly civilized man to engage in–like creating wealth–all to sustain them, the enlightened taste-makers.  There are books to review, damn it.  We’ll hear all sorts of blather about how investigative reporting is a public good, yada yada yada, and how we need public financing to support it.  Remember the Crimson!  They’ll cry.  The rats will rally around the Crimson idea: a newspaper supported by a nanny who can help them pull their punches.  Maybe newspapers should start calling themselves banks? TARP funds may be in their future yet!

But let’s have a sober moment to reflect on the public good that is the NYTimes.  Ah, yes.  The first person they should fire: Thomas Friedman.  I can’t believe they pay this Horatio Hack a salary, a pension and even health benefits.  Worse, they seem to fly the man around world, at great expense, like some kind of cuddly mascot for mild left wing mediocrity.  Yesterday he wrote: 

Landing at Kennedy Airport from Hong Kong was, as I’ve argued before, like going from the Jetsons to the Flintstones.

In September 2007, he wrote: 

Fly from Zurich’s ultramodern airport to La Guardia’s dump. It is like flying from the Jetsons to the Flintstones.

In May 2008, he wrote: 

we landed at Singapore’s ultramodern airport, with free Internet portals and children’s play zones throughout. We felt, as we have before, like we had just flown from the Flintstones to the Jetsons.

In January 2002, he wrote: 

For all the talk about the vaunted Afghan fighters, this was a war between the Jetsons and the Flintstones–and the Jetsons won and the Flintstones know it.

Now that’s some hard hitting investigative reporting.  Novel use of old TV shows to illustrate a concept.  Hat tip to James Taranto.

Advertisements

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Press Release Contagion Part II

Almost as if on cue, from stage left, another erroneous piece of science reporting struts upon the stage.  USA Today’s headline: Poverty Dramatically Affects Children’s Brains.  The nut: 

A new study finds that certain brain functions of some low-income 9- and 10-year-olds pale in comparison with those of wealthy children and that the difference is almost equivalent to the damage from a stroke.

“It is a similar pattern to what’s seen in patients with strokes that have led to lesions in their prefrontal cortex,” which controls higher-order thinking and problem solving, says lead researcher Mark Kishiyama, a cognitive psychologist at the University of California-Berkeley.

Thankfully, we don’t have to rely on science reporters.  The feedback from experts via blogs is…what was Bill Gates’ phrase?….faster than the speed of thought.  Tyler Cowen passed the USA Today story and the research paper it was based on to Michelle Dawson, a researcher at the University of Montreal who specializes in childhood brain development.   No need for press releases!  Dawson writes: 

 

I read the poor vs rich kids brains study (Kishiyama et al.). It’s a very small study (13 in each group) and the groups aren’t matched on ethnicity. In the major task (the one which got media attention), where the authors looked at ERPs [TC: here is a link on ERP], the performance of the two groups was the same. The performance of the two groups on a Stroop task, a classic test of what the poor kids are said to be incapable of, was also the same. The major performance difference between groups was on vocabulary (the WISC-III vocabulary test), but only a few tests were used. There was no attempt to match the groups on IQ.

Sez Cowen: 

Just to repeat two key points: a) the observed difference in electrical current patterns may depend on IQ differences, not poverty, and b) on the actual major task the poor kids did just as well.  There are tasks where the poor children do less well but this is hardly news.

Popular science reporting on neuro issues is very often not to be trusted.

Science reporters of the world.  Let’s sing it again: correlation does not imply causation! 

 

2 Comments

Filed under Uncategorized

The Press Release Contagion

One of the more remarkable, if disheartening aspects of the news industry is how much of the news is as artificially processed as Velveeta.  I’ve been in editorial meetings where the entire upcoming news cycle has depended on press releases from PR flacks.  What does that mean: it means the so-called journalists I was working with didn’t actually investigate anything.  They barely if ever left the building.  Instead, they became filters to separate good press releases from the bad ones.  If a release merited coverage, then that journalist would call some researchers to get some explanation and some quotes.  Never even has to leave the desk.  They write up a story, based largely on the release and a phone call, and presto, we have “news.” For fun you can see how different newspapers and magazines write up the same story. 

The inefficiencies in this editorial system are maddening.  They’re also one of the reasons the media industry as a whole is in decline.  (See Tribune, bankruptcy).  Consider all the salaries and benefits of those involved: PR flacks, journalists, editors, copy editors.  Consider the cost of office space for these people.  And then consider the emotional heat generated by the whole process: pitching press release based stories, convincing editors of their merit, a day long editing cycle where comments from editors and copy-editors must be met and dealt with.  It’d all be worthwhile if this actually produced useful information.  But it doesn’t. 

Consider the latest press release that won the hearts of editors around the world: a study from the British Medical Journal claiming happiness is contagious within a social network.  It’s a trendy bit of research, so it’s unsurprising the story appeared in hundreds of newspapers.  But unfortunately the journalists covering the story never took a statistics class.  They all have degrees in weak subjects like English Literature and Comp Lit.  Otherwise they would know the chant: correlation does not imply causation.  Sing it again: correlation does not imply causation. 

Thankfully the blogosphere is tearing down the edifice of Velveeta press release based journalism.  Justin Wolfers, an economist at UPenn who specializes in happiness studies, ruins the fun

There are (at least) three reasons why happiness is correlated within social networks. It may be that — as the authors posit — happiness is contagious. Or perhaps people with similar dispositions are more likely to be friends. Economists call this the confounder “selection effects,” while medical journals call it “homophily.” The authors partly account for this by adding statistical controls for the past happiness of both you and your friends.

The third reason is perhaps the most likely: if you and I are friends, we are often subject to similar influences. If a buddy of ours dies, we’ll both be less happy. Or, less dramatically, if our favorite football team wins, we’ll both be happier. But this isn’t contagious happiness — it is simply a natural outcome of the shared experiences of people in the same social circles. Unfortunately, observational data cannot distinguish the headline-grabbing conclusion — that happiness is contagious — from my more mundane alternative: friends have shared emotional influences.

Blogs have collapsed the distance between the expert and the public.  Publishers should sober up on that. The basic datum of this kind of news–the fact–no longer needs to wind its way through journalists, editors, and copy-editors before reaching the public.   Newspapers will continue to hemorrhage money until they realize this.  And journalists will continue to write bland, uninteresting, and sometimes false stories as long as they remain chained to their desks, wholly dependent on what Paul Graham calls “The Submarine.”

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized